Write an essay that addresses the questions in either option 1 or 2 (please do not write on more than one option). Your paper should have an introduction, conclusion, and a clear thesis statement. All paraphrased passages and quoted material may be cited using the following format: (author, page number). Please submit your paper to the Quercus submission portal, which will be opened close to the deadline. There is no penalty for going over the word limit, but a lengthy essay is still required to be succinct (i.e. the discussion/argumentation should be expressed using as few words as is necessary)—you are not expected to go over the recommended word length to write an excellent paper. No research outside of the assigned articles/course material is required or recommended. Evaluation is based on the accurate reconstruction of course material (80%) and original critical analysis (20%).
- Do all acts of procreation generate liability for the harms of existence? Explain Shiffrin’s position and evaluate her arguments that draw from the case of ‘wealthy’, life-saving treatment of an unconscious person, and the distinction between ‘pure’ benefits and benefits that involve the removal of harms. In the course of evaluating this ‘anti-natalist’ position, consider how a more permissive view might attempt to justify procreation (you may consider Kumar to achieve this part of the analysis).
- There are various proposals concerning the ground of parental obligations: biological connection, causation, gestation, intention, and voluntary commitment, the creation of vulnerability, or the Hazmat theory. In light of these options, defend what you take to be the most plausible account of parental obligations. With reference to your view, can parental obligations be transferred? Does your position distinguish between ‘Joe blow’ and ‘Joe the sperm-donor’?
Do you need urgent help with this or a similar assignment? We got you. Simply place your order and leave the rest to our experts.