Philosophy of Ethics

OVERVIEW
Having a firm grasp of the ethical principles that will guide you as a researcher in your career are essential. This can be difficult to put into words and even writing. Writing down the ethical concepts will provide you with the confidence and map for you to conduct an ethical career. You will express with confidence your own sense of identity and values related to your views on ethics in research which are thoughtfully expressed and defended, and establishment of a foundation of belief that will allow for future actions “that are honest, courageous, and consistent with your beliefs.

INSTRUCTIONS
You will complete one 12—15-page paper (typed, double-spaced APA format with at least 5 biblical verses and 10 sources [peer reviewed research and textbooks]). Note that the 12-15 pages is the minimum and maximum range for the body of the paper (i.e., this does not include cover page nor reference list).

The following is to be utilized as a guide for writing up your paper:
• Write an introduction (provide a brief summary of ethics in human subjects research).
• The body of the paper is where you will address your own mission statement and ethical philosophy. Next how do they serve as your guiding light in ethical dilemmas discussed within this course. How would they guide your decision making in the various aspects of research including publication, data, human subjects, mentorship, etc… You will cite specific ethical dilemmas that have been discussed in the course readings and discussion board activities and how their mission statement will guide them through the scenarios.
• You must include a concluding paragraph (or 2) that provides a brief summary of your paper as well as gives some ideas as to your future evaluation/reflection of your current ethical philosophy.
Components of the paper must include the following:
• An introduction
• A mission statement
• Ethical philosophy
• Integration of ethical dilemmas and how your philosophy guides your decisions
o publication
o data management
o protection of human subjects
o protection of animal subjects
o role of the IRB and informed consent
o mentorship
• Summary

Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

Below are overview of week 1-week 6 Module for reference.

Read: Bulger, Heitman, & Reiser: pp. 89 — 113
Module 1: Week 1 Introduction
Overview
To establish a foundation for the entire course, you will examine the importance of research ethics and the series of historical events that established the current ethical framework. It is from this framework that procedures were developed to help protect human subjects in research.
Learning Outcomes
Upon successful completion of this module, you will be able to:
Identify critical historical events that helped to establish current guidelines. Reflect on sources of self-deception and threats to the integrity of research. Describe the social and ethical responsibilities of scientists.

Review: Bulger, Heitman, & Reiser: pp. 3 — 54
Module 2: Week 2 Introduction
Overview
In this module, you will investigate how scientific discovery drives innovative advances that may lead to life-saving treatments. However, the potential benefits of scientific research coincide with the potential risks to participants which lead to the development of ethical principles to guide researchers.

Learning Outcomes
Upon successful completion of this module, you will be able to:
Identify the ethical principles of the Belmont Report.
Reflect on the events that led to the Nuremburg Code and its key elements.
Describe the importance of informed consent in the research process.

Read: Bulger, Heitman, & Reiser: pp. 117 — 150
Module 3: Week 3 Introduction
Overview
It is your responsibility as a researcher to ensure the protection of human subjects. You, as a researcher, are guided by ethical principles including respect for persons, justice, and beneficence. Additionally, oversight was developed in the form of the institutional review board (IRB) to ensure subjects are further protected.
Lerning Outcomes
Upon successful completion of this module, you will be able to:

Distinguish the two key elements that encompass respect for persons.
Determine the role of justice and beneficence in the protection of human subjects in research.
Describe the framework for which the IRB and FDA operate.

Read: Bulger, Heitman, & Reiser: pp. 57 — 63, 78 — 85, 155 — 216
Module 4: Week 4 Introduction
Overview
Understanding of the concepts that govern responsible conduct of scientists is critical for you as a researcher. Understanding established norms in situations and how to analyze complex situations where norms do not exist is essential for success in science.

Learning Outcomes
Upon successful completion of this module, you will be able to:
Articulate the framework for prevention of scientific misconduct.
Reflect on the value of science on the individual and social level.
Describe the importance of the process of how science advances and the intuitional role in this.

Read: Bulger, Heitman, & Reiser: pp. 68 — 70, 221 — 241
Module 5: Week 5 Introduction
Overview
In this module, you will investigate how the scientific process of inference is one that needs to be protected. However, there are many pitfalls in this process. Outside of gross misconduct, data acquisition, access, management and interpretation must also utilize good practices to maintain integrity.

Learning Outcomes
Upon successful completion of this module, you will be able to:
Identify the key elements to ensure objectivity of data collection and analysis.
Describe the concept and value of data sharing in the research process.
Explain the roles and responsibilities of the principal investigator.

Read: Bulger, Heitman, & Reiser: pp. 89 — 113
Module 6: Week 6 Introduction
Overview
In this module, you will examine the many facets of the publication process. Within the authorship framework, what determines justification for authorship and the impact of developing an ethical code for science authorship?

Learning Outcomes

Upon successful completion of this module, you will be able to:

Determine irresponsible and wasteful authorship.
Discuss the concept of ethical authorship guidelines.
Detail the purpose of publication and the responsibility associated with the process.

Do you need urgent help with this or a similar assignment? We got you. Simply place your order and leave the rest to our experts.

Order Now

Quality Guaranteed!

Written From Scratch.

We Keep Time!

Scroll to Top