Prerequisite: Answer the following four questions.
Each answer corresponds to one of the questions and must have a maximum length of two (2) pages (double-spaced and in 12-point Arial font).
You will present a single document where the sheets of the four separate answers are included. Each question is associated with one of the L400 lessons listed below (L401-L404). Be sure to use the criteria in the guide to formulate your response. You must use footnotes and a bibliography.
| Question #1–L401: The Transition to Leadership Explain the change in mindset required of a leader when he or she takes command and how a commander applies his or her judgment when evaluating an organization and solving problems to accomplish the mission. Use at least two examples from the “Ridgway Takes Command” case study to illustrate your answer. | |
| Guide to Assessment | |
| Criteria: Substantive analysis | Punctuation |
| Clearly and logically demonstrate your understanding of the change in mindset required of a leader.It clearly and logically explains how a commander uses the elements of command in support of the application of the art of command.Illustrate these ideas with at least two examples from the “Ridgway Takes Command” case study.It lays out your personal understanding of the concept and how it will be applied in future organizations. | |
| Question #2 -L403: Leadership Training Explain the two-phase approach to leadership development. Use at least two examples from any L400 case study to illustrate your answer. | |
| Guide to Assessment | |
| Criteria: Substantive analysis | Punctuation |
| It explains in a clear and logical way the evaluation and integration phase of the leadership training process. It clearly and logically explains the meaning-making phase of leadership development. Illustrate with at least two examples of any L400 case study.It lays out your personal understanding of the concept and how it will be applied in future organizations. | |
| Question #3–L402: Complexity Explain the Cynefin model and how a commander can use cause-and-effect relationships with this model to solve problems and make decisions in warfare. Use at least two examples from the case study “The Yom Kippur War, 1973” to illustrate your answer. | |
| Guide to Assessment | |
| Criteria: Substantive analysis | Punctuation |
| Choose a domain and clearly and logically explain the causal relationships in that domain. Explain clearly and logically how the commander uses the model to solve problems and make decisions.Illustrate with at least two examples from the case study “The Yom Kippur War, 1973.”It lays out your personal understanding of the concept and how it will be applied in future organizations. | |
| Question #5 –L404: The Commander’s Visualization Explain the relationship between situational awareness (SU) and commander visualization in large-scale operations, as well as the challenges of generating the SU and developing commander visualization. Use at least two examples from the case study “MG Cota and the Battle of the Huertgen Forest” to illustrate your answer. | |
| Guide to Assessment | |
| Criteria: Substantive analysis | Punctuation |
| It clearly and logically explains the relationship between situational understanding and commander visualization. It should also include what role judgment plays in achieving the commander’s visualization.It clearly and logically explains the challenges of generating and maintaining situational understanding and developing commander visualization in large-scale operations. Illustrate with at least two examples from the case study “MG Cota and the Battle of the Huertgen Forest.”It lays out your personal understanding of the concept and how it will be applied in future organizations. | |
Do you need urgent help with this or a similar assignment? We got you. Simply place your order and leave the rest to our experts.